On January 14, I purchased a box of chips that was clearly marked on sale for $8.99 (regular $9.99). Unfortunately, I did not notice until two days later that I had been charged $9.99 on my receipt.
On January 16, I returned to the store to speak with customer service (Effath). I showed her clear photo evidence taken on January 14, including a timestamp, the product, shelf price, and barcode. She insisted that the barcode in the photo did not match the one on my receipt. I explained that if there was a mismatch, it was likely due to a store pricing or system issue, not an error on my part.
I also referenced the Scanner Price Accuracy Voluntary Code, endorsed by the Competition Bureau and managed by the Retail Council of Canada, which states that when an item scans higher than the displayed price and is under $10, the customer is entitled to receive the item free of charge. Despite this, she refused to apply the policy.
She then asked me to leave my already-paid-for box with her (suggesting I might switch it) and instructed me to go back to the shelf to take a new photo. When I did, I noticed the price had since changed to $9.99 (likely due to a new flyer), but I also took photos showing the same product with the same barcode and same weight still on the shelf. She then claimed the grams were different, which was incorrect. When I pointed this out, she stated she could not verify anything because she was not working on January 14.
I asked to speak with a supervisor or manager and was told that no manager or supervisor was working, which is highly unlikely, especially during the afternoon. Throughout the interaction, she was dismissive, resistant, and unwilling to acknowledge the evidence provided.
I returned to the store on another day to try resolving the issue with different staff. After reviewing the same photos and explanation, two employees told me that the Scanner Price Accuracy policy only applies if the issue is raised on the same day, which contradicts the intent of the policy and was not previously communicated.
Overall, this experience was extremely frustrating. I came prepared with documentation, acted in good faith, and simply asked the store to honor a well-known consumer protection policy for a $1 overcharge. Instead, I was met with resistance, shifting explanations, and inconsistent information.